RETURN to AlphaUniverse.com
Jump to content
Welcome To Our Community!

Discuss, share & explore photography, video, vlogging and making the most of your gear.

ErikCsosza

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ErikCsosza

  1. I agree with Tony above. Do you need the extra reach of 400mm. Many nature photographers tend to like wildlife or may eventually get into wildlife and the 100-400mm will serve you better. I personally don't see much of a reason to get a f/2.8 lens if you're taking photos of landscapes and will never shoot it at f/2.8. At that point, you're spending a lot of money on a feature you won't use. Hope that helps!

    Thanks for your answer and help.

  2. Hello Together

    I am a hobby photographer. I shoot with a Sony A7IV camera.

    I have the lenses 16-35/4 Zeis and 24-105/4 G.

    I am thinking of buying a telephoto lens.

    Which would you recommend the 70-200/2.8 GM or 100-400 GM?

    I like to take pictures in the mountains and also details of the mountains.

    Thank you very much for your help.

    Greetings from Switzerland, Erik

×
×
  • Create New...