RETURN to AlphaUniverse.com
Jump to content
Welcome To Our Community!

Discuss, share & explore photography, video, vlogging and making the most of your gear.

ST

Members
  • Posts

    84
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ST

  1. FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G - landscape, environmental portraits, family events

    FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS - travel, street, landscape

    FE 50mm f/1.2 GM - low light situations, but otherwise I use my zoom lenses

    FE 70-200 mm f/2.8 GM OSS II - my favourite for daily walks in nature. I carry the 2.0X teleconverter in case I need more reach for distant wildlife or candid shots

    FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 OSS - wildlife, especially birds in flight

     

    • Like 2
  2. First GM lens

    70-200 F2.8 OSS GM II
    I just got it a few weeks ago, and I've been ecstatically happy with it. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find the 2x teleconverter I had planned to get with it - until today. I picked it up late this afternoon and plan to check it out tomorrow. 
    Here's an example of why I wanted the 2x teleconverter. I would have liked to fill the frame with these photos, but I couldn't crop that much without degrading the results. Taken two days ago. All at 1/2000-1/2500, F2.8, 200 mm, ISO 100.

    1691iB22D5F6D4FF2F3C8.thumb.jpg.439b4d8b07570c59d1e53cc26dd2d06d.jpg1692i20AE567B09F44198.thumb.jpg.4a9848804a5b634f7f8d3a423991b4ce.jpg1694i9B4F709B0F8842B4.thumb.jpg.abce9d12bc454134e0ad2a6317385866.jpg1695iD3DC2BFCD3308A2F.thumb.jpg.b9091c6f943dc2f57ee63ab5f06547ec.jpg

    History - what I used to shoot with
    I had used the FE 24–105mm F4 G OSS Lens (SEL24105G)  as my daily all-around lens for about five months, and I was very happy with that. I also got the PZ 16-35 F4 for some environmental portraits, landscape and some video. I walk outdoors daily, and lately, there has been more wildlife, but most of those creatures were beyond the reach of the 24-105. And since I often walk in the early hours, I wondered about how much more I could photograph with a wider aperture.

    Why did I choose the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II?

    See the list below of the lenses I considered. I have shown the features that mattered most to me. 

    • Weight and, to a lesser extent, size
      • I have to be able to carry it for 10 miles
      • Use it hand-held
    • Versatility 
      • widest to the narrowest field of view 
        • Wildlife and landscapes
      • fastest aperture
    • Performance
      • All three lenses below get great reviews
      • Autofocus speed
      • Image quality


    I considered 

    1. FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II (SEL70200GM2) with 2x Teleconverter Lens (SEL20TC) 
      1045 + 207 = 1252 grams88 x 200 mm + 62.4 x 42.7 mm (total length 242.7 mm)

      • This combination would give me a fast zoom
        • F2.8 for 70-200
          and with the teleconverter
        • F5.6 for 140-400 
      • Reviews of this combination suggested that I should get comparable results at 400mm to the FE 100-400 F4.5-5.6 GM below 
      • Internal zoom
      • All the latest GM II features (announced 2022)
        • XD Linear Motors
        • Aperture ring
        • 3 mode OSS
      • Shortest minimum focus distance 0.4–0.82 m
    2. FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS (SEL100400GM) 1,395 grams / 93.9 x 280 mm at 400 mm

      • Older GM design (announced 2017)
        • Linear motor and Direct Drive SSM
      • External zoom
      • Minimum focus distance 0.98 m/3.22 ft
    3. FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) 2,115 grams / 111.5 x 318 mm

      • Not GM 
      • Announced 2019
      • Minimum focus distance 2.4 m
      • Internal zoom
      • Too heavy to carry for the duration of my long walks, and I'd probably need to carry
        • a tripod or monopod
        • a second lens for more typical landscape shots
      • I had a chance to try this lens on my camera today. It was challenging to hand-hold it at 600 mm.

    A quick update to my post above. 

    I got the Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) 13 days ago and despite my reservations above

    • It's a fine lens (G is still great vs. GM)
    • While the minimum focus distance is 2.4 meters, it's not as big an issue as I had imagined
    • The internal zoom is great, and the 1/4 turn to go from 200-600 mm is terrific
    • I'm getting used to the weight, and I have carried it at least 7 km for 12 of the past 13 days

    Here are a couple of shots.

    1774i7778E15A44D6BDE2.thumb.jpg.615fb09a22f18b25e4504a65c272239c.jpg1775iA067959FA6DAF6F0.thumb.jpg.8407073162ccc05d82204a44016249fe.jpg 

    • Like 1
  3. Hi, Drew,

    I hope it's okay to drop in some photos in your thread.

    I often walk before dawn - my favourite time of day (but not great for photographs). This is from a couple of days ago.

    As the sun was just about to rise 

    1771i285569A99BE651A3.thumb.jpg.74124a6864c0eccb613c0a9d92926f7d.jpg

    At about the same time, facing the opposite direction you could see that pre-dawn light reflected in the buildings 

    1772i7EEC63BB628C5951.thumb.jpg.dc8c00b96d67c8345976534a663b758f.jpg

    and a glimpse of the moon as the sun was rising

    1773i5375D9F4758D5227.thumb.jpg.29d745badf321b2107cd165e6f3422a5.jpg

  4. First GM lens

    70-200 F2.8 OSS GM II

    I just got it a few weeks ago, and I've been ecstatically happy with it. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find the 2x teleconverter I had planned to get with it - until today. I picked it up late this afternoon and plan to check it out tomorrow. 

    Here's an example of why I wanted the 2x teleconverter. I would have liked to fill the frame with these photos, but I couldn't crop that much without degrading the results. Taken two days ago. All at 1/2000-1/2500, F2.8, 200 mm, ISO 100.

    1691iB22D5F6D4FF2F3C8.thumb.jpg.1e3f0a6cf7c66678904ffb956a511b84.jpg1692i20AE567B09F44198.thumb.jpg.daa15c949a42b08687fc1a3263897ca4.jpg1694i9B4F709B0F8842B4.thumb.jpg.00f42935bf1ddd5745e00a78a6e73029.jpg1695iD3DC2BFCD3308A2F.thumb.jpg.2b330544f7afd1301f50989b91843c78.jpg

    History - what I used to shoot with

    I had used the FE 24–105mm F4 G OSS Lens (SEL24105G)  as my daily all-around lens for about five months, and I was very happy with that. I also got the PZ 16-35 F4 for some environmental portraits, landscape and some video. I walk outdoors daily, and lately, there has been more wildlife, but most of those creatures were beyond the reach of the 24-105. And since I often walk in the early hours, I wondered about how much more I could photograph with a wider aperture.

    Why did I choose the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II?

    See the list below of the lenses I considered. I have shown the features that mattered most to me. 

    • Weight and, to a lesser extent, size
      • I have to be able to carry it for 10 miles
      • Use it hand-held
    • Versatility 
      • widest to the narrowest field of view 
        • Wildlife and landscapes
      • fastest aperture
    • Performance
      • All three lenses below get great reviews
      • Autofocus speed
      • Image quality

     

    I considered 

    1. FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II (SEL70200GM2) with 2x Teleconverter Lens (SEL20TC) 

      1045 + 207 = 1252 grams88 x 200 mm + 62.4 x 42.7 mm (total length 242.7 mm)

      • This combination would give me a fast zoom
        • F2.8 for 70-200

          and with the teleconverter

        • F5.6 for 140-400 
      • Reviews of this combination suggested that I should get comparable results at 400mm to the FE 100-400 F4.5-5.6 GM below 
      • Internal zoom
      • All the latest GM II features (announced 2022)
        • XD Linear Motors
        • Aperture ring
        • 3 mode OSS
      • Shortest minimum focus distance 0.4–0.82 m
    2. FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS (SEL100400GM) 1,395 grams / 93.9 x 280 mm at 400 mm

      • Older GM design (announced 2017)
        • Linear motor and Direct Drive SSM
      • External zoom
      • Minimum focus distance 0.98 m/3.22 ft
    3. FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) 2,115 grams / 111.5 x 318 mm

      • Not GM 
      • Announced 2019
      • Minimum focus distance 2.4 m
      • Internal zoom
      • Too heavy to carry for the duration of my long walks, and I'd probably need to carry
        • a tripod or monopod
        • a second lens for more typical landscape shots
      • I had a chance to try this lens on my camera today. It was challenging to hand-hold it at 600 mm.
    • Like 1
  5. I just got a 70-200 F2.8 GM II, and it's been a revelation. I put the 24-105 on my first camera about six months ago and loved it. I took it on my daily walks and enjoyed the versatility of being able to go wide to mild zoom in a quarter turn. I only took it off to use my PZ 16-35 F4 G for occasional landscapes, but mainly for environmental portraits and some video of musicians at recurring community event. 

    Here is one of my first shots with the 70-200.

    1567i0B7F3AC7582593B2.thumb.jpg.18a9399872abd6f70fc530f8607c8ec8.jpg

    On the beach in the rain yesterday.

    1564i2A179920A2FDCCBF.thumb.jpg.12824ea96d0b72256714b60e6289a010.jpg

    And today on a street near that beach

    1565iF3689BB89148B122.thumb.jpg.eccb6443941abeb4c69e7df6fca1e251.jpg

     

     

  6. Most valuable - my camera hip bag/holster plus shoulder sling

    I'm a belt and suspenders kind of person.

    I've found the only way I can carry my A7IV or A1 with a 70-200 GM II for my two-to-three hour daily walks, is a holster bag on a padded belt. If I carry the camera bag on my shoulder, or in a backpack, or carry the camera in my hands, my back gives me grief. 

    The holster bag/belt is a now discontinued LowePro model. It's deep enough to (barely) fit the body and 70-200 with the lens hood in place. It's ready to shoot as soon as I pull it from the bag. I keep the camera in the bag as I hike around. The camera only comes out to shoot photos. This way, the camera is not exposed to the elements and is not vulnerable if I trip and tumble or brush up against something.

    I also have a shoulder sling attached to the bottom of the camera (tripod mount). The sling is loose so there's no weight on my shoulder. Its only function is safety in case I lose my grip on the camera.

    Today, the worst case happened. I had caught a fold in my rain jacket in the closing snap for the belt holster. Two kilometers in, I moved my arm and tugged at the rain jacket in just the wrong way. With that, the belt holster released.  The belt, holster and camera headed toward the ground, but the shoulder sling strap saved the camera leaving it dangling at my hip. Otherwise, the camera would have hit the ground, landing on the lens hood. Even in the bag, well, I wouldn't want to guess at the damage.

    So, that's why the belt and suspenders (shoulder sling) approach and why I can't live without these two items (belt/bag and shoulder sling).

×
×
  • Create New...